Social versus organizational values

When it is recognized that actual decisions must take place in some such institutional setting, it can be seen that the “correctness” of any particular decision may be judged from two different standpoints. In the broader sense it is “correct” if it is consistent with the general social value scale80—if its consequences are socially

Organizational identification

To designate the phenomenon we are discussing, we may introduce the term “identification” which has already had some currency in political theory. “Identification” is used in psychoanalytic literature to denote a particular kind of emotional tie. Freud describes the nature of the tie thus: It is easy to state in a formula the distinction

Modifying identifications through organization

It would seem that a major problem in effective organization is to specialize and subdivide activities in such a manner that the psychological forces of identification will contribute to, rather than hinder, correct decision-making. 1. Modes of Specialization The way in which activities are subdivided in the organization will have a major influence on

Cognitive bases and mechanisms for identification

1. COGNITIVE BASES FOR IDENTIFICATION The cognitive component of the mechanism of identification discussed in Chapter X can be described thus: As we saw in Chapter IX, high-level goals often provide little guide for action because it is difficult to measure their attainment and difficult to measure the effects of concrete actions upon them.

Altruism in organizational behavior

Contemporary evolutionary theory has cautioned us against attributing altruistic motives to people. In standard models of natural selection, nice guys generally aren’t fit—they don’t multiply as rapidly as their more selfish brethren. This argument has often been used to fill the utility function with selfish personal economic goals. But the argument is incorrect; models

The process of composite decision

It should be perfectly apparent that almost no decision made in an orga- nization is the task of a single individual. Even though the final responsibility for taking a particular action rests with some definite person, we shall always find, in studying the manner in which this decision was reached, that its various components

Planning and review in the process of composite decision

There are two administrative techniques that are of key importance in the process of composite decision and in bringing to bear on a single decision a multiplicity of influences. Reference has already been made to them from time to time, but they deserve more systematic discussion as a part of the over-all decisional structure

The Anatomy of Organization: Centralization and decentralization

Our examination of the process of composite decision, and particularly of the methods and functions of review in an organization, casts considerable light on the way in which decisional processes can best be distributed through the organization, and on the relative advantages and disadvantages in centralizing the processes of decision. What has already been

The Anatomy of Organization: Lessons for administrative theory

In Chapter 11 the position was taken that the currently accepted “principles of administration” are little more than ambiguous and mutually contradictory proverbs, and that a new approach was needed to establish a consistent and useful administrative theory. This is a fact that is beginning to be recognized in the literature of administration. If

The role of the administrator

It may be appropriate to conclude this volume with a brief statement about the role and training of administrators. It has been suggested earlier that the decisions which might be uniquely designated as “administrative” decisions are those which are concerned with the decision-making process itself. That is, such decisions do not determine the content

A half century of growth in organization theory

The commentaries on the preceding chapters of Administrative Behavior mainly examined the important new ideas that have been injected into organization theory by the half century of research and observation since the book was first published. The purpose of these final comments is to observe how these ideas are related to the text that

The birth of an organization

We hear a good deal these days about an organization’s need for a “vision statement” and a “mission statement.” Many of the manifestos produced in response to this supposed need appear to contain little more than apple pie and motherhood. A proclamation that a company is going to make high quality products, give its

The business school: A problem in organizational design

In 1949 I came to Carnegie Institute of Technology to assist in the organi- zation of a new business school, the Graduate School of Industrial Admin- istration (GSIA). Its central educational mission was to offer a master’s degree in Industrial Administration for persons wishing to prepare for a career in management, but the plans

What Is an Administrative Science?

THE DISTINCTION MADE IN CHAPTER III between the ethical and the factual helps to explain the nature of administrative science. Scientific propositions, it was said in that chapter, are statements about the observable world and the way in which it operates. Ethical propositions, on the other hand, are expressions of preferences. Do principles of

Early Institutional Theory in Economics

1. European Quarrels It is good at the outset to acknowledge the lack of logical coherence in the strands of work to be examined. In many respects, the “old” institutional economics bears a stronger intellectual kinship with the “new” institutional approaches advanced by sociologists and organiza- tional scholars than to the “new” institutional economics.

Early Institutional Theory in Political Science

Institutional approaches dominated political science in both Europe and America during the latter half of the 19th century and the first two decades of the 20th century. I concentrate on the American scene, but first call attention to the work of a well-known but neglected student of institutions and organizations: Alexis de Tocqueville. Living

Early Institutional Theory in Sociology

Attention to institutions by sociologists has been more constant than that exhibited by either economists or political scientists. While there are a number of different discernible strands with their distinctive vocabularies and emphases, we also observe continuity from the early work of Spencer and Sumner through Davis to the recent work of Friedland and

Institutions and Organizations: Early Approaches

1. The Columbia School: Merton’s and Selznick’s Institutional Models Shortly after selections from Weber’s seminal writings on bureau- cracy were translated into English during the late 1940s, a collection of scholars at Columbia University under the leadership of Robert K.Merton revived interest in bureaucracy and bureaucratization, its sources and consequences for behavior in organizations

Foundations of Neo-institutional Theory

We have arrived at the point in our history when the ideas that have come to be recognized as neoinstitutional theory appeared. As we will see, they do not represent a sharp break with the past, although there are new emphases and insights. In this section, I review the proximate sources and founding conceptions

Crafting an Analytic Framework: Three Pillars of Institutions

To an institutionalist, knowledge of what has gone before is vital information. The ideas and insights of our predecessors provide the context for current efforts and the platform on which we necessar- ily craft our own contributions. However, as should be clear even from my brief review, the concepts and arguments advanced by our