Linguistic theory (also known as the ‘new riddle of induction’) concerning the concept of confirmation or prediction, developed by the American philosopher Nelson Goodman (1906-1998).
According to Goodman, it is possible to define a vocabulary in such a way that, given a choice between two possibilities, it is as likely that the possibility which runs counter to previous experience will be chosen as will the more predictable one.
To illustrate this apparent breakdown in reasoning, Goodman devised a new predicate (which he called ‘grue’); given a choice between two separate provable statements that all emeralds were green and all emeralds were blue, he argued instead that all emeralds were in fact ‘grue’.
Also see: INDUCTIVE PRINCIPLE, induction
N Goodman, Fact, Fiction and Forecast (1954, revised 1965)
6 thoughts on “Goodman’s paradox (20TH CENTURY)”
Thanks for another great post. The place else could anyone get that kind of information in such a perfect manner of writing? I have a presentation subsequent week, and I’m at the search for such info.
Thank you for some other excellent post. Where else could anyone get that kind of information in such an ideal method of writing? I have a presentation next week, and I am at the search for such information.
These are in fact great ideas in on the topic of blogging.
You have touched some good factors here. Any way keep
What’s up, the whole thing is going well here and ofcourse every one is
sharing information, that’s actually fine, keep up
Amazing! Its truly awesome article, I have got much clear idea
regarding from this piece of writing.
Definitely believe that which you said. Your favorite justification appeared to be on the web the easiest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I certainly get irked while people think about worries that they plainly don’t know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top and defined out the whole thing without having side-effects , people can take a signal. Will probably be back to get more. Thanks